Questão jurídica principal
Whether the revision was admissible despite the complaint that the 28-page interrogation transcript was not reproduced with the procedural objection under Sections 136 and 136a StPO, but only with a prior complaint under Section 261 StPO.
Decisão extraída
The procedural objection remained admissible; the transcript did not have to be repeated with the later objection if it had already been sufficiently presented in connection with the earlier objection.
Fundamentação extraída
The Court held that the absence of a renewed reproduction of the same transcript for the second objection did not preclude admissibility because the factual material was already before the court in the revision submissions.