BAG 6 AZR 595/07•Revision dismissed in employer-loan tariff dispute
BAG 6 AZR 595/07Bag / Divisão 621 de jan. de 2010Dismissed
Extraído pela Omnilex
In a revision proceedings concerning an employer loan and a tariff limitation period, the Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht. The parties had waived findings of fact and reasons because the case was linked to a parallel lead case. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: If the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel lead case, the appellate court may issue a judgment without factual findings or reasons. In revision, such a judgment is reviewed only within the scope allowed by the procedural posture; where no reversible error is established, the revision is to be dismissed. The waiver in relation to a leading parallel case does not by itself preclude a valid judgment without reasons (consid. not stated).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-01-21
Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 595/07
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Frankfurt, 23. Mai 2006, Az: 16/4 Ca 9661/05, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. März 2007, Az: 17 Sa 1790/06, Urteilnachgehend BVerfG, 26. April 2010, Az: 1 BvR 907/10, Nichtannahmebeschluss
Spruchkörper: 6. Senat
Arbeitgeberdarlehen - Tarifliche Ausschlussfrist - Urteil ohne Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. März 2007 - 17 Sa 1790/06 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 6 AZR 556/07 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO).
| Fischermeier | Brühler | Spelge | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kapitza | Koch |
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment was successful
The revision was dismissed.
The court issued the judgment without facts or reasons because the parties waived them in view of a parallel lead case.
Allocation of costs of the revision
The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.
Costs followed the dismissal of the revision.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.