Dismissal invalidity of termination against defendant 1

BAG 6 AZR 773/11Bag / Divisão 613 de dez. de 2012Partially Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The employee pursued a declaratory claim against defendant 1 challenging a termination dated 24 December 2009. The Federal Labor Court upheld the revision in part, set aside the Hessian State Labor Court judgment insofar as it had rejected the appeal against defendant 1, and amended the first-instance judgment to declare that the employment relationship was not terminated by that notice. The Court also adjusted the allocation of court and out-of-court costs for all instances, including revision costs against defendant 1. No factual or legal reasoning was provided because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons under § 313a ZPO.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 313a ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons does not preclude appellate review of the operative part; where the revising court amends the lower-court judgment on a declaratory employment claim, it may itself decide the merits and adjust costs accordingly. The operative part is controlling for the extent of the set-aside and amendment; costs are to be allocated by instance and party in accordance with the outcome of the proceedings.

Texto completo

BAG — 6 AZR 773/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-12-13

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 773/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Frankfurt, 6. Dezember 2010, Az: 2 Ca 344/10, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 25. Juli 2011, Az: 17 Sa 175/11, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Tenor

  1. Auf die Revision der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 25. Juli 2011 - 17 Sa 175/11 - aufgehoben, soweit es die Berufung der Klägerin betreffend die Beklagte zu 1. zurückgewiesen hat.

  2. Auf die Berufung der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Frankfurt am Main vom 6. Dezember 2010 - 2 Ca 344/10 - teilweise abgeändert:

Es wird festgestellt, dass das Arbeitsverhältnis zwischen der Klägerin und der Beklagten zu 1. durch die Kündigung vom 24. Dezember 2009 nicht aufgelöst worden ist.

  1. Die Gerichtskosten und die außergerichtlichen Kosten der Klägerin in erster Instanz hat die Klägerin zu 2/5 und die Beklagte zu 1. zu 3/5, in zweiter Instanz die Klägerin zu 1/4 und die Beklagte zu 1. zu 3/4 zu tragen. Die außergerichtlichen Kosten der Beklagten zu 2. in erster und zweiter Instanz hat die Klägerin zu tragen. Die Beklagte zu 1. trägt ihre außergerichtlichen Kosten erster und zweiter Instanz selbst.

  2. Die Beklagte zu 1. hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .

FischermeierGallnerSpelge
SchäferkordReiner Koch

Palavras-chave

employment relationshipterminationdeclaratory reliefrevisioncost allocationwaiver of reasons

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the employment relationship between the plaintiff and defendant 1 ended by the termination of 2009-12-24.

Decisão extraída

The termination did not dissolve the employment relationship as between the plaintiff and defendant 1.

Fundamentação extraída

The Federal Labor Court set aside the appellate judgment to the extent it had rejected the plaintiff's appeal against defendant 1 and, on appeal, amended the first-instance judgment by granting the declaratory claim.

Questão jurídica principal

Allocation of costs in the first, second, and revision instances.

Decisão extraída

Costs were allocated partly to the plaintiff and partly to defendant 1; defendant 2 had to bear its own extrajudicial costs, and defendant 1 bore the costs of the revision.

Fundamentação extraída

The operative part specifically apportioned court and out-of-court costs by instance and party.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.