BAG 6 AZR 835/11•Revision upheld; employer’s appeal dismissed in labor dispute
BAG 6 AZR 835/11Bag / Divisão 616 de mai. de 2013Modified
Extraído pela Omnilex
In this labor-law revision, the Federal Labour Court set aside the judgment of the Saxon Regional Labour Court and rejected the defendant’s appeal against the Bautzen Labour Court judgment. The decision was issued without findings of fact or reasons because the parties had waived them under Section 313a ZPO. The defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal and revision.
§ 313a ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may dispose of the revision by operative part only. If the revision is upheld, the appellate judgment is set aside and, where appropriate, the opponent’s appeal against the first-instance judgment is dismissed; the costs of the appeal and revision may be imposed on the losing party by the operative part alone.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-05-16
Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 835/11
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Bautzen, 20. Oktober 2010, Az: 1 Ca 1065/10, Urteilvorgehend Sächsisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 21. September 2011, Az: 2 Sa 715/10, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 6. Senat
Auf die Revision des Klägers wird das Urteil des Sächsischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 21. September 2011 - 2 Sa 715/10 - aufgehoben.
Die Berufung der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Bautzen vom 20. Oktober 2010 - 1 Ca 1065/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Die Kosten der Berufung und der Revision hat die Beklagte zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .
| Fischermeier | Gallner | Spelge | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Jostes | Lauth |
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff’s revision against the appellate judgment was successful.
The revision succeeded; the appellate judgment was set aside.
The Federal Labour Court upheld the plaintiff’s challenge without setting out reasons, as the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons.
Whether the defendant’s appeal against the first-instance judgment was well-founded.
The defendant’s appeal was rejected.
The appellate judgment was overturned, and the first-instance judgment remained in force.
Allocation of the costs of appeal and revision.
The defendant must bear the costs of the appeal and the revision.
The operative part expressly places the costs on the defendant.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.