BAG 9 AZR 835/12•Employment period from 2004 to 2011 to be credited
BAG 9 AZR 835/12Bag / Division 915 de out. de 2013Modified
Extraído pela Omnilex
The claimant appealed in an employment dispute concerning the crediting of a period of service. The Federal Labour Court partially upheld the claimant's revision and rejected the defendant state's revision. It set aside the Berlin-Brandenburg Regional Labour Court's judgment in part and amended the Berlin Labour Court's judgment so that the period from 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2011 must also be taken into account. The defendant state was ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings.
§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; where the parties waive statement of facts and reasons, the decision is issued accordingly. In revision, the Federal Labour Court may partially set aside the appellate judgment and amend the first-instance judgment if the contested period must additionally be taken into account; the successful party's claim is then to be granted to that extent, and costs follow the outcome of the litigation.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-10-15
Aktenzeichen: 9 AZR 835/12
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Berlin, 26. Januar 2012, Az: 58 Ca 15279/11, Urteilvorgehend LArbG Berlin-Brandenburg, 9. August 2012, Az: 25 Sa 333/12 und 25 Sa 405/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 9. Senat
Auf die Revision der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg vom 9. August 2012 - 25 Sa 333/12 und 25 Sa 405/12 - unter Zurückweisung der Revision des beklagten Landes teilweise aufgehoben.
Auf die Berufung der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Berlin vom 26. Januar 2012 - 58 Ca 15279/11 - mit der Maßgabe abgeändert, dass auch die Zeit vom 1. Januar 2004 bis zum 30. Juni 2011 zu berücksichtigen ist.
Das beklagte Land hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .
| Brühler | Krasshöfer | Klose | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kranzusch | M. Lücke |
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the period from 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2011 had to be taken into account.
Yes. The Court held that this period must also be considered.
The judgment modifies the first-instance decision accordingly and partially sets aside the appellate judgment, extending the relevant period to be credited.
How the revision petitions of both parties should be decided.
The claimant's revision succeeded in part, while the defendant state's revision was rejected.
The Federal Labour Court partially set aside the appellate judgment on the claimant's revision and rejected the defendant state's revision.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.