BAG 9 AZR 398/13•Crediting employment period from 2004 to 2011
BAG 9 AZR 398/13Bag / Division 915 de out. de 2013Partially Granted
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Labor Court partially upheld the plaintiff's revision against the Land Berlin. It partially set aside the judgment of the Berlin-Brandenburg Regional Labor Court and amended the Labor Court judgment so that the period from 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2011 is also to be taken into account. The defendant state was ordered to bear the costs of the litigation. The parties had waived findings of fact and reasons.
§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons: Where the parties validly waive findings of fact and reasons, the judgment may be rendered in shortened form. In revision, the Federal Labor Court may partially set aside and amend the lower judgments where the contested assessment of the period to be taken into account proves incomplete; the operative part then determines the extent of the credited period. Costs follow the outcome of the proceedings.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-10-15
Aktenzeichen: 9 AZR 398/13
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Berlin, 12. Juni 2012, Az: 50 Ca 11291/11, Urteilvorgehend LArbG Berlin-Brandenburg, 20. Februar 2013, Az: 4 Sa 1582/12 und 4 Sa 1711/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 9. Senat
Auf die Revision der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg vom 20. Februar 2013 - 4 Sa 1582/12 und 4 Sa 1711/12 - unter Zurückweisung der Revision des beklagten Landes teilweise aufgehoben.
Auf die Berufung der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Berlin vom 12. Juni 2012 - 50 Ca 11291/11 - mit der Maßgabe abgeändert, dass auch die Zeit vom 1. Januar 2004 bis zum 30. Juni 2011 zu berücksichtigen ist.
Das beklagte Land hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .
| Brühler | Krasshöfer | Klose | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kranzusch | M. Lücke |
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's additional period from 2004-01-01 to 2011-06-30 had to be taken into account.
Yes. The lower judgments were partially set aside and the case was amended so that this period is also included.
The tenor shows that the appellate court corrected the lower court's assessment by extending the period to be considered; no further reasoning is stated because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.