BAG 8 AZR 1070/12•Revision granted; defendant's appeal dismissed in parallel labor case
BAG 8 AZR 1070/12Bag / Division 822 de mai. de 2014Modified
Extraído pela Omnilex
In this labour-law revision, the Federal Labour Court set aside the judgment of the Lower Saxony Regional Labour Court and rejected the defendant’s appeal against the Göttingen Labour Court judgment. The case was handled in parallel with the leading proceeding 8 AZR 1069/12, and the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons. The only dispositive consequences stated are the success of the plaintiff’s revision and the allocation of the costs of appeal and revision to the defendant.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; decision in parallel proceedings with waiver of findings of fact and reasons: where the parties waive the statement of facts and the reasons in view of a leading parallel case, the Federal Labour Court may confine itself to the operative part. The revision may be successful even without a written reasoning, and the appellate judgment is to be set aside if the defendant's appeal is dismissed; costs follow the outcome of the appeal and revision.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-05-22
Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 1070/12
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Göttingen, 28. September 2011, Az: 4 Ca 211/11 Ö, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Niedersachsen, 1. November 2012, Az: 4 Sa 1529/11, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 8. Senat
Auf die Revision des Klägers wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Niedersachsen vom 1. November 2012 - 4 Sa 1529/11 - aufgehoben.
Die Berufung der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Göttingen vom 28. September 2011 - 4 Ca 211/11 Ö - wird zurückgewiesen.
Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Berufung und der Revision zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 8 AZR 1069/12 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Hauck | Winter | W. Reinfelder | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Umfug | Pauli |
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's revision should succeed and the defendant's appeal be rejected in the parallel labor case.
The revision succeeded; the appellate judgment was set aside and the defendant's appeal against the first-instance judgment was rejected.
The decision was rendered in parallel with the leading case; the parties waived findings of fact and reasons, so only the dispositive outcome is recorded.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.