BAG 3 AZR 904/12•Revision succeeds; claim dismissed in pension case
BAG 3 AZR 904/12Bag / Divisão 313 de jan. de 2015Modified
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court decided an employment dispute by judgment under § 313a Abs. 1 ZPO. It granted the defendant's revision, set aside the judgment of the Düsseldorf Regional Labour Court, amended the judgment of the Düsseldorf Labour Court, and dismissed the claimant's action. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings. No further factual or legal reasoning is provided because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons.
§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons: where the parties validly waive the statement of facts and reasons, the court may issue a short-form judgment containing only the dispositive part. On successful revision, the Federal Labour Court may set aside the appellate judgment, amend the first-instance judgment, dismiss the action and allocate costs according to the outcome; no further reasons are required beyond the operative part.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-01-13
Aktenzeichen: 3 AZR 904/12
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2015:130115.U.3AZR904.12.0
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Düsseldorf, 16. April 2012, Az: 14 Ca 4745/11, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf, 7. September 2012, Az: 6 Sa 865/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 3. Senat
Auf die Revision der Beklagten wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 7. September 2012 - 6 Sa 865/12 - aufgehoben.
Auf die Berufung der Beklagten wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 16. April 2012 - 14 Ca 4745/11 - abgeändert.
Die Klage wird abgewiesen.
Die Klägerin hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .
| Zwanziger | Schlewing | Ahrendt | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xaver Aschenbrenner | H. Frehse |
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the defendant's revision against the Düsseldorf LAG judgment was well-founded
Yes. The Federal Labour Court upheld the revision, set aside the appellate judgment, and dismissed the action.
The decision contains only the dispositive outcome; the parties waived reasons under § 313a Abs. 1 ZPO, so no detailed merits reasoning is provided.
Allocation of court costs
The claimant must bear the costs of the litigation.
Costs follow the dismissal of the action after the successful revision.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.