Interim injunction refused for data retention law

BVerfG 1 BvQ 55/15Bverfg / 1. Senat 3. Kammer12 de jan. de 2016Dismissed

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected an application for an interim order aimed at preventing the entry into force of §§ 113b and 113c TKG, introduced by the 10 December 2015 data retention act. It held that the applicant had not demonstrated that the harms from allowing the law to enter into force and later finding it unconstitutional would clearly outweigh the harms caused by temporarily blocking a law that might ultimately be constitutional. The decision is final.

Sumário Omnilex

Art. 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG; interim relief against the entry into force of a statute is granted only where the balance of consequences clearly favours provisional suspension. The Court applies a strict weighing of the disadvantages of enforcement against those of preventing a potentially constitutional law from taking effect. Mere uncertainty as to the constitutionality of the statute does not suffice; the applicant must show a manifest predominance of the irreversible disadvantages on the side of enforcement (consid. 1).

Texto completo

BVerfG — 1 BvQ 55/15, Ablehnung einstweilige Anordnung

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-01-12

Aktenzeichen: 1 BvQ 55/15

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:qk20160112.1bvq005515

Dokumenttyp: Ablehnung einstweilige Anordnung

Normen: Art 2 Abs 1 GG, Art 10 Abs 1 GG, § 32 Abs 1 BVerfGG, § 113b TKG 2004 vom 10.12.2015, § 113c TKG 2004 vom 10.12.2015, Art 2 Nr 2 VerkdHSpFruSpPflEG

Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 3. Kammer

Titelzeile

Ablehnung des Erlasses einer einstweiligen Anordnung bzgl des Inkrafttretens der §§ 113b, 113c TKG idF des Gesetzes zur Einführung einer Speicherpflicht und einer Höchstspeicherfrist für Verkehrsdaten vom 10.12.2015 ("Vorratsdatenspeicherung")

Gründe

1 Der Antrag auf Erlass der begehrten einstweiligen Anordnung gemäß § 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG hat keinen Erfolg. Das Vorbringen des Antragstellers lässt nicht erkennen, dass Nachteile, die mit dem Inkrafttreten des Gesetzes nach späterer Feststellung seiner Verfassungswidrigkeit verbunden wären, die Nachteile, die im Falle der vorläufigen Verhinderung eines sich als verfassungsgemäß erweisenden Gesetzes einträten, in Ausmaß und Schwere deutlich überwiegen (vgl. BVerfGE 104, 23 <27>; 117, 126 <135>; 121, 1 <17>; stRspr).

2 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.

Palavras-chave

interim reliefconstitutional complaintdata retentionbalancing of consequencestelecommunications data

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether an interim order should be issued to suspend the entry into force of the data retention provisions.

Decisão extraída

The application was refused because the applicant did not show that the disadvantages of allowing the law to enter into force and later finding it unconstitutional would clearly outweigh the disadvantages of temporarily blocking a law that might prove constitutional.

Fundamentação extraída

Under § 32(1) BVerfGG, the Court weighs the consequences. That balance did not favor provisional suspension, so the exceptional remedy was not justified.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.