BVerfG 2 BvC 27/14•Recusal motion rejected; election complaint dismissed
BVerfG 2 BvC 27/14Bverfg / Divisão 22 de mar. de 2016Dismissed
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Constitutional Court rejected a recusal motion directed against the members of the Second Senate as inadmissible and dismissed the election review complaint. The Court stated that the complaint had no prospect of success for the reasons set out in the rapporteur's letter of 3 February 2016 and therefore dispensed with any further reasoning under § 24 sentence 2 BVerfGG.
§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG; election review complaint; summary dismissal without further reasoning; recusal motion. A motion to recuse members of the Federal Constitutional Court is inadmissible where it does not meet the statutory requirements. If an election review complaint is manifestly unfounded or otherwise lacks merit for the reasons previously communicated by the rapporteur, the Court may dismiss it by order and, pursuant to § 24 sentence 2 BVerfGG, refrain from giving additional reasons.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-03-02
Aktenzeichen: 2 BvC 27/14
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:cs20160302.2bvc002714
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 19 BVerfGG, § 24 S 2 BVerfGG, § 48 BVerfGG
Spruchkörper: 2. Senat
Zurückweisung eines Ablehnungsgesuchs und Verwerfung (a-limine-Abweisung) einer Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde ohne weitere Begründung
Das Ablehnungsgesuch gegen die Mitglieder des Zweiten Senats wird als unzulässig verworfen.
Die Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde wird verworfen.
1 Der Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde bleibt aus den im Schreiben des Berichterstatters vom 3. Februar 2016 genannten Gründen der Erfolg versagt. Gemäß § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG wird von einer weiteren Begründung abgesehen.
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the recusal motion against the members of the Second Senate was admissible
The motion was inadmissible.
The Court rejected the recusal request without further substantive review.
Whether the election review complaint had any merit
The complaint was dismissed without further reasoning.
The Court relied on the reasons stated in the rapporteur's letter of 3 February 2016 and, under § 24 sentence 2 BVerfGG, declined to provide further reasons.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.