BVerfG 2 BvR 1383/16•Constitutional complaint against Bundestag resolution inadmissible
BVerfG 2 BvR 1383/16Bverfg / 2. Senat 1. Kammer7 de dez. de 2016Inadmissible
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Constitutional Court's First Chamber of the Second Senate did not admit the constitutional complaint against the German Bundestag's Armenia resolution. The complaint was held inadmissible because the complainant failed to sufficiently substantiate the possibility that his fundamental rights or equivalent rights had been violated; no such violation was otherwise apparent. The decision is final and not subject to appeal.
Art. 93 para. 1 no. 4a GG; §§ 23 para. 1 sentence 2, 90, 92, 93d para. 1 sentence 3 BVerfGG; constitutional complaint against a parliamentary resolution is inadmissible if the complainant does not sufficiently substantiate a possible violation of fundamental rights or rights equivalent to fundamental rights. The constitutional complaint must identify, with sufficient detail, the challenged act, the possibly infringed rights, and the manner in which the alleged violation may arise; a mere assertion is insufficient. If such substantiation is lacking, the complaint is not admitted to decision; the Chamber may reject it without reasons under § 93d para. 1 sentence 3 BVerfGG.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-12-07
Aktenzeichen: 2 BvR 1383/16
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:rk20161207.2bvr138316
Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung
Normen: Art 93 Abs 1 Nr 4a GG, § 23 Abs 1 S 2 BVerfGG, § 90 BVerfGG, § 92 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG
Spruchkörper: 2. Senat 1. Kammer
Kammerbeschluss mit Tenorbegründung: Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen "Armenienresolution" des Deutschen Bundestages mangels Darlegung einer Grundrechtsverletzung unzulässig
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen. Sie ist unzulässig, da der Beschwerdeführer die Möglichkeit einer Verletzung seiner Grundrechte oder grundrechtsgleichen Rechte nicht ausreichend dargelegt hat und im Übrigen eine solche auch nicht ersichtlich ist.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the constitutional complaint should be admitted for decision.
The complaint was not admitted because the complainant did not sufficiently substantiate a possible violation of fundamental rights or equivalent rights; such a violation was otherwise not apparent.
The submission failed to meet the substantiation requirements for a constitutional complaint under the Federal Constitutional Court Act.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.