Constitutional complaint inadmissible for lack of subsidiarity

BVerfG 1 BvR 1411/17Bverfg / 1. Senat 3. Kammer4 de ago. de 2017Inadmissible

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint. It held the complaint inadmissible because the complainant had not satisfied the stricter requirements of material subsidiarity. As a consequence, the pending request for an interim order became moot. The Court gave no further reasons pursuant to § 93d Abs. 1 sentence 3 BVerfGG.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 90 Abs. 2 S. 1 BVerfGG; material subsidiarity of the constitutional complaint: Beyond formal exhaustion of legal remedies, the complainant must also invoke available and suitable remedies at the lower court level in a timely and substantively sufficient manner. A constitutional complaint is inadmissible if the alleged constitutional violation could have been remedied in the ordinary proceedings and the complainant failed to do so. If the main complaint is not accepted, an ancillary request for interim relief becomes moot (consid. 1).

Texto completo

BVerfG — 1 BvR 1411/17, Nichtannahmebeschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-08-04

Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 1411/17

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rk20170804.1bvr141117

Dokumenttyp: Nichtannahmebeschluss

Normen: § 90 Abs 2 S 1 BVerfGG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Landessozialgericht Hamburg, 8. Mai 2017, Az: L 4 AS 114/17 B ER, Beschlussvorgehend SG Hamburg, 30. März 2017, Az: S 61 AS 1031/17 ER, Beschluss

Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 3. Kammer

Titelzeile

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Unzulässigkeit einer Verfassungsbeschwerde wegen materieller Subsidiarität

Tenor

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Mit der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung gegenstandslos (§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG).

Gründe

1 Die Verfassungsbeschwerde ist unzulässig, weil sie den Anforderungen der - über das Gebot der Rechtswegerschöpfung im engeren Sinne hinausgehende - materiellen Subsidiarität nicht genügt (vgl. BVerfGE 107, 395 <414>; 134, 106 <115 Rn. 27> stRspr).

2 Von einer weiteren Begründung im Übrigen wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

3 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.

Palavras-chave

constitutional complaintinadmissibilitysubsidiaritylegal remedy exhaustioninterim reliefsocial benefits

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the constitutional complaint was admissible despite failure to satisfy material subsidiarity

Decisão extraída

The complaint was inadmissible because it did not meet the requirements of material subsidiarity beyond mere exhaustion of legal remedies.

Fundamentação extraída

The Court applied its settled case law that a complainant must also make use of available lower-level remedies and present the matter there sufficiently, not merely exhaust the formal legal path.

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the pending request for interim relief remained to be decided

Decisão extraída

The request for an interim order became moot after the constitutional complaint was not accepted.

Fundamentação extraída

Once the main constitutional complaint was not admitted, the ancillary interim-relief request lost its object.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.