BVerfG 2 BvR 2147/10•Refusal to appoint counsel; constitutional complaint not admitted
BVerfG 2 BvR 2147/10Bverfg / 2. Senat 2. Kammer16 de nov. de 2010Dismissed
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Constitutional Court, sitting as a chamber of the Second Senate, rejected the complainant’s request for appointment of counsel and did not admit the constitutional complaint for decision. The order contains no reasons and is final and non-appealable. Prior proceedings included decisions of the Regional Court of Hamburg and the Hanseatic Higher Regional Court of Hamburg.
§ 22 Abs. 1 S. 4 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; appointment of counsel in constitutional complaint proceedings and non-admission by chamber order: A request for appointment of counsel may be rejected where the chamber sees no basis under the applicable procedural requirements. A constitutional complaint may be disposed of by chamber order without reasons if it is not taken up for decision; such a non-admission order is final and not subject to appeal. The decision may be rendered summarily where the statutory prerequisites are not met.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-11-16
Aktenzeichen: 2 BvR 2147/10
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rk20101116.2bvr214710
Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung
Normen: § 22 Abs 1 S 4 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg, 16. Juli 2010, Az: 1 - 21/10 (REV), Beschlussvorgehend LG Hamburg, 13. Mai 2009, Az: 710 Ns 42/09, Urteilvorgehend LG Hamburg, 13. Mai 2009, Az: 710 Ns 42/09, Beschlussvorgehend LG Hamburg, 24. April 2009, Az: 710 Ns 42/09, Beschlussnachgehend Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, 26. Juli 2018, Az: 35778/11, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 2. Senat 2. Kammer
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung - Ablehnung der Zulassung eines Beistandes
Der Antrag auf Zulassung eines Beistands wird abgelehnt.
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the request for appointment of counsel should be granted in the constitutional complaint proceedings.
The request was denied.
The chamber saw no basis for appointing counsel under the governing procedural rules.
Whether the constitutional complaint should be admitted for decision.
The complaint was not admitted.
The chamber found no grounds to take the complaint up for decision and issued the decision without reasons.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.