BVerwG 1 B 1/17, 1 B 1/17 (1 C 21/17)•Revision allowed on EU-law entry ban without time limit
BVerwG 1 B 1/17, 1 B 1/17 (1 C 21/17)Bverwg / Divisão 11 de ago. de 2017Granted
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court upheld the plaintiffs’ complaint against the refusal to admit revision. It held that the case has fundamental importance within the meaning of § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO because it may clarify the legal consequences of a statutory entry and residence ban that is contrary to EU law due to the absence of a time limit. The order concerns only the admissibility of revision, not the merits of the underlying immigration dispute.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance. A complaint against non-admission is well founded where the case raises a question requiring clarification by the revising court. Fundamental importance exists if the matter is capable of contributing to the further development or clarification of unsettled legal consequences of a norm, here in particular the consequences of a statutory entry and residence ban that is incompatible with Union law because it lacks temporal limitation.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-08-01
Aktenzeichen: 1 B 1/17, 1 B 1/17 (1 C 21/17)
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:010817B1B1.17.0
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg, 27. Oktober 2016, Az: OVG 12 B 18.15, Urteilvorgehend VG Berlin, 27. August 2015, Az: 29 K 8.15
Spruchkörper: 1. Senat
Revisionszulassung; Rechtsfolgen eines mangels Befristung unionsrechtswidrigen gesetzlichen Einreise- und Aufenthaltsverbots
1 Die Beschwerde der Kläger ist zulässig und begründet.
2 Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat insbesondere Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Rechtsfolgen eines mangels Befristung unionsrechtswidrigen gesetzlichen Einreise- und Aufenthaltsverbots geben.
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental importance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.
Revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance.
The complaint was admissible and well-founded. The case may provide further clarification on the legal consequences of an entry and residence ban that is unlawful under EU law because it lacks a time limit.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.