USA v. Dario Espinosa

09-16143Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit23 de jul. de 2010

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 23, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-16143
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 09-00030-CR-5-001-RS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DARIO ESPINOSA,
a.k.a. D,
a.k.a. Dario Espinosa-Alvarez,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(July 23, 2010)
Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

-- 1 of 2 --

Christopher Patterson, appointed counsel for Dario Espinosa in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Espinosa’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.