USA v. Bole

10-10329Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit8 de dez. de 2010

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DEC 08, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-10329
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:02-cr-00374-LSC-TMP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL GLENN BOLE,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(December 8, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James L. O’Kelley, appointed counsel for Michael Glenn Bole, filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

-- 1 of 2 --

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Bole’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.