USA v. Stansel

10-14078Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit18 de abr. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
APR 18, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-14078
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:91-cr-00272-JDW-EAJ-5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RAYMOND GRADY STANSEL, JR.,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 18, 2011)
Before CARNES, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for Raymond Grady Stansel, Jr. in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

-- 1 of 2 --

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Stansel’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.