USA v. Loranzo Thomas

10-14319Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit19 de dez. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DECEMBER 19, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-14319
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00035-JA-GJK-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LORANZO THOMAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(December 19, 2011)
Before MARCUS, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

-- 1 of 2 --

John S. Mills and Gregory Philo, appointed counsel for Loranzo Thomas in
this direct appeal, have moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant, and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87
S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues
of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Thomas’s convictions
and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.