11-10069•Leroy White vs Charlie Jones, et al
11-10069Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit13 de jan. de 2011
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JANUARY 13, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-10069
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:02-cv-00524-KOB-JEO
LEROY WHITE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
CHARLIE JONES,
Warden,
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA,
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondents - Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
Before EDMONDSON, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
Alabama death row inmate Leroy White has moved this Court for a
certificate of appealability (“COA”) to review the district court’s denial of his
-- 1 of 3 --
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from the district court’s
judgment denying White’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
We deny White’s motion for a COA as unripe because he has not filed a
motion for a COA in the district court first and obtained a ruling from the district
court. See United States v. Futch, 518 F.3d 887, 894 n.1 (11th Cir. 2008)
(“District courts must consider and rule upon the propriety of issuing the COA
first, that is, before a request for a COA will be received or acted on by this court
or a judge of this court.”).
Alternatively, we deny the motion for a COA in the reasons outlined in our
order denying White’s second motion for a stay of execution.
MOTION DENIED.
-- 2 of 3 --
WILSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting:
I dissent from the Court’s denial of the motion for a COA for the reasons
outlined in my dissent from the order denying White’s second motion for a stay of
execution.
-- 3 of 3 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.