USA v. Thomas A. Iodice

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JANUARY 26, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-14156
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:97-cr-00037-RS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
THOMAS A. IODICE,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(January 26, 2012)
Before EDMONDSON, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Thomas Iodice in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18
L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

-- 1 of 2 --

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Iodice’s supervised release
revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --