Rhonda Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security

11-15128Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit27 de mar. de 2012

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MARCH 27, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-15128
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cv-01354-TBM
RHONDA RAMIREZ,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(March 27, 2012)
Before CARNES, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Rhonda Ramirez appeals the district court’s decision affirming the

-- 1 of 2 --

Commissioner’s denial of her applications for a period of disability, disability
insurance benefits, and supplemental security income benefits. She contends that
her “borderline intellectual functioning” was inconsistent with the general learning
ability levels required for the jobs the vocational expert determined she could do.
She did not raise this issue before the district court, however, and we generally
will not consider an argument not raised before the district court. See Kelley v.
Apfel, 185 F.3d 1211, 1215 (11th Cir. 1999). We decline to do so here.
AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.