USA v. Tishard Romell Brown

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13220
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00207-BAE-GRS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TISHARD ROMELL BROWN,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
_________________________
(March 27, 2014)
Before PRYOR, MARTIN, and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Nye, appointed counsel for Tishard Brown in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Brown, arguing that
there are no non-frivolous grounds on which Brown could appeal either his
conviction or his sentence. Nye filed a brief identifying arguable issues for appeal
Case: 13-13220 Date Filed: 03/27/2014 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Brown did
not respond to Nye’s motion to withdraw or the Anders brief.
After a careful, independent review of the record, we conclude that there are
no non-frivolous grounds on which Brown could base an appeal. For this reason,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown=s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-13220 Date Filed: 03/27/2014 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --