USA v. Israel Pineda

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10419
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:05-cr-00380-RWS-ECS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ISRAEL PINEDA,
a.k.a. Becerro,
a.k.a. Borrego,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(December 24, 2014)
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-10419 Date Filed: 12/24/2014 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Israel Pineda in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,
18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pineda’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED. However, we sua sponte REMAND for the limited
purpose of correcting a scrivener’s error in Count 2 of the written judgment. The
statute of conviction should read 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(A), (h), rather than solely
18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(A).
Case: 14-10419 Date Filed: 12/24/2014 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --