USA v. Norman V. Charlton

14-12805Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit17 de mar. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-12805
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00505-RAL-EAJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NORMAN V. CHARLTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(March 17, 2015)
Before HULL, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Norman Charlton in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Charlton
Case: 14-12805 Date Filed: 03/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,
18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Charlton’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-12805 Date Filed: 03/17/2015 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.