USA v. Brian James Hulse

21-10359Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit2 de ago. de 2021

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 21-10359
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00214-TFM-C-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRIAN HULSE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(August 2, 2021)
Before NEWSOM, LAGOA, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 21-10359 Date Filed: 08/02/2021 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Domingo Soto, appointed counsel for Brian Hulse in this revocation of
supervised release appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Hulse’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-10359 Date Filed: 08/02/2021 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.