USA v. Richard Palacios

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-12722
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RICHARD PALACIOS,
a.k.a. Cachinge,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00509-CEH-TGW-3
USCA11 Case: 22-12722 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 03/26/2024 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 22-12722
____________________
Before WILLIAM PRYOR , Chief Judge, NEWSOM , and ANDERSON,
Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Darlene Calzon Barror, appointed counsel for Richard Pala-
cios in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of
the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of
the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s mo-
tion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Palacios’s conviction and sen-
tence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-12722 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 03/26/2024 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --