22-13288•The Douglas Stewart Company, Inc. v. HIQO Solutions, Inc.
22-13288Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit1 de dez. de 2023
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-13288
____________________
THE DOUGLAS STEWART COMPANY, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
HIQO SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 4:20-cv-00101-WTM-CLR
____________________
Before WILSON, J ILL PRYOR , and B RASHER , Circuit Judges.
USCA11 Case: 22-13288 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 12/01/2023 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 22-13288
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff-Appellant The Douglas Stewart Company, Inc.
(“DSC”) sued Defendant-Appellee HiQo Solutions, Inc. (“HiQo”)
for breach of contract under Georgia law, alleging that HiQo
failed to provide DSC with an “improved and functional” e-
commerce website in compliance with the parties’ Master Ser-
vices Agreement (“MSA”). D.E. 1 at 11. Following cross-motions
for summary judgment, the district court ruled in HiQo’s favor.
Interpreting the MSA, the court concluded as a matter of law that
“HiQo never agreed to provide a fully functional website by a
specific date, and in fact expressly disclaimed such an obligation.”
D.E. 109 at 33. DSC timely appealed.
After reviewing the parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of
oral argument, we agree with the district court that DSC failed to
demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether
HiQo breached its obligations under the MSA. We thus affirm
based on the district court’s well-reasoned order.
AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-13288 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 12/01/2023 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.