Shelley Carrier v. Jest Operating, Inc., et al

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-11130
____________________
DORIS HADCOCK
Plaintiff,
SHELLEY CARRIER,
personal representative of the estate of
Doris Hadcock,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JEST OPERATING, INC.,
d.b.a. Somerset,
PATRICIA R. LEININGER,
MERIDETH C. NAGEL,
MERIDETH NAGEL, P.A.,
ELIZABETH HEIMAN,
USCA11 Case: 23-11130 Document: 64-1 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Page: 1 of 3

-- 1 of 3 --

2 Opinion of the Court 23-11130
Defendants-Appellees,
MICHAEL J. ROGERS, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 5:20-cv-00095-JSM-PRL
____________________
Before WILSON, L UCK , and L AGOA , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We have considered all arguments raised on appeal by Plain-
tiff-Appellant Shelley Carrier, including that:
I. The district court abused its discretion in excluding
the testimony and report of Kathryn Strodel.
II. The district court abused its discretion in excluding
evidence and testimony relating to Neal Hadcock’s probate.
III. The district court abused its discretion in excluding
evidence of Neal Hadcock’s residency at Somerset Assisted Living
Facility.
USCA11 Case: 23-11130 Document: 64-1 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Page: 2 of 3

-- 2 of 3 --

23-11130 Opinion of the Court 3
IV. The district court erred in granting Defendants’ mo-
tions for directed verdicts.
After careful review and consideration of the briefs and the
record, and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversi-
ble error in the proceedings in the district court. Therefore, the
judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 23-11130 Document: 64-1 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Page: 3 of 3

-- 3 of 3 --