Sherman Lee Ridley v. Johnson SP Warden

23-12876Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit6 de nov. de 2023

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-12876
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
SHERMAN LEE RIDLEY,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
JOHNSON SP WARDEN,
Respondent-Appellee.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cv-03787-SEG
____________________

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 23-12876
Before ROSENBAUM , L AGOA, and A BUDU, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
tion. Sherman Ridley, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals
the district court’s May 30, 2023, final order and judgment. The
statutory time limit required him to file a notice of appeal on or
before June 29, 2023, 30 days after the district court entered its judg-
ment. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). The no-
tice of appeal, deemed filed on August 25, 2023, the date he deliv-
ered it to prison officials for mailing, is therefore untimely, and we
lack jurisdiction. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Jeffries v. United States,
748 F.3d 1310, 1314 (11th Cir. 2014); Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606
F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
other applicable rules.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.