Music Royalty Consulting, Inc. v. William McLean

24-11193Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit16 de mai. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 24-11193
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
MUSIC ROYALTY CONSULTING, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM RUDOLPH MCLEAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 6:22-cv-02110-RBD-DCI
____________________
USCA11 Case: 24-11193 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 05/16/2024 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 24-11193
Before WILSON, NEWSOM , and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
tion. William McLean appeals from the district court’s April 12,
2024 order resolving all claims as to liability but leaving the ques-
tion of remedies to be determined at a future hearing. We lack
jurisdiction because that order left the question of damages to be
resolved later and, thus, is not a final decision. See CSX Transp., Inc.
v. City of Garden City, 235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 2000) (providing
that we generally only have jurisdiction over the final decisions of
district courts); Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737, 744
(1976) (providing that a judgment that determines liability but
leaves the assessment of damages or other relief to be determined
is not final).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
other applicable rules.
USCA11 Case: 24-11193 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 05/16/2024 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.