Finjan Inc., a Delaware corporation v. Symantec Corp., a Delaware corporation, WEBSENSE INC., a Delaware corporation

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
FINJAN INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SYMANTEC CORP., a Delaware corporation,
WEBSENSE INC., a Delaware corporation, AND
SOPHOS INC., a Massachusetts corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
______________________
2013-1682
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in No. 1:10-CV-00593-GMS, Chief
Judge Gregory M. Sleet.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
P AUL J. ANDRE, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-
appellant. With him on the brief were L ISA K OBIALKA and
J AMES HANNAH ; and AARON M. F RANKEL of New York,
New York. Of counsel on the brief was J EFFREY M.
HARRIS , Bancroft PLLC, of Washington, DC.

-- 1 of 2 --

D AVID A. N ELSON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sulli-
van, LLP, of San Francisco, California, and SEAN C.
CUNNINGHAM , DLA Piper LLP, of San Diego, California,
argued for defendants-appellees. On the brief for Syman-
tec Corp. were J ENNIFER A. K ASH , SEAN S. P AK and D AVID
A. N ELSON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of
San Francisco, California. On the brief for Websense, Inc.
were ANTHONY M. STIEGLER and L ORI R. M ASON, of Cooley
LLP, of San Diego, California. Of then brief for Sophos
Inc. were J OHN ALLCOCK, SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM , STANLEY
J. P ANIKOWSKI, and K ATHRYN RILEY G RASSO, DLA Piper
LLP, of San Diego, California.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, N EWMAN and
REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
September 15, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --