Federal Circuit disposition — 14-1649

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE SCREENIVAS KRISHNAN, KOEN
BENNEBROEK, KARTHIK BHAT, STEFANO A.
PESCADOR, DAVID G. REED, BRAD W. SIMERAL,
AND EDWARD M. VEESER
______________________
2014-1649
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/610,411.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
Before O’MALLEY , WALLACH , and HUGHES , Circuit Judges.
O’MALLEY , Circuit Judge.
O R D E R
The Director of the United States Patent and
Trademark Office (“PTO”) moves without opposition to
remand this case to the PTO for further proceedings.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board affirmed the Exam-
iner’s rejection of certain claims, but the PTO concedes that
the Board should reconsider its rejection in light of the
PTO’s examination policy on “configured to” claim lan-
guage.
Case: 14-1649 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 09/19/2014

-- 1 of 2 --

IN RE KRISHNAN 2
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The motion is granted. This case is remanded for
further proceedings consistent with this order.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
F OR T HE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
s30
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 19, 2014
Case: 14-1649 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 09/19/2014

-- 2 of 2 --