Convatec Technologies Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
CONVATEC TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
Appellant
v.
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2014-1822, 2014-1823
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos.
IPR2013-00097, IPR2013-00102.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
RICHARD T ORCZON, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich &
Rosati, PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also
represented by J EFFREY WILLIAM G UISE, P ETER R.
MUNSON, L ORELEI P EREZ WESTIN, San Diego, CA.
BRADLEY T HOMAS L ENNIE, Hunton & Williams LLP,
Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by
J EFFREY B. VOCKRODT , CHRISTOPHER H. YAEN; D AVID A.
K ELLY , Atlanta, GA.

-- 1 of 2 --

MONICA BARNES L ATEEF , Office of the Solictor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA,
argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented
by N ATHAN K. K ELLEY, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (CHEN, L INN, and H UGHES , Circuit Judg-
es).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
August 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --