Third Circuit disposition — 253557np-pdf

HLD-010 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 25-3557
___________
IN RE: EDDY ALEXANDRE,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
(Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 1:24-cv-02123)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
January 22, 2026
Before: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, HARDIMAN and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: March 3, 2026)
_________
OPINION*
_________
PER CURIAM
Eddy Alexandre has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order
directing the District Court to rule on his habeas petition. After Alexandre filed his
mandamus petition, the District Court ruled on his habeas petition by dismissing it on
February 2, 2026. Thus, because Alexandre has received all the relief he requested, his
* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
petition is moot and we will dismiss it on that basis. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum
Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996).

-- 2 of 2 --