14-1771•In re: VINCENT L. ABELL v. Maria Theresa Wilson
14-1771Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de mar. de 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1771
In re: VINCENT L. ABELL,
Debtor,
-------------------------------------
VINCENT L. ABELL,
Debtor – Appellant,
v.
MARIA THERESA WILSON,
Appellee,
ROGER SCHLOSSBERG, Chapter 11,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
Judge. (8:14-cv-01037-DKC)
Submitted: February 20, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Philip J. McNutt, HUGHES & BENTZEN, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for
Appellant. Richard M. Goldberg, Anastasia L. McCusker, SHAPIRO,
-- 1 of 3 --
2
SHER, GUINOT, & SANDLER, Baltimore, Maryland; Randell C. Ogg,
LAW OFFICES OF RANDELL C. OGG, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Vincent L. Abell appeals from the district court’s order
upholding the bankruptcy court’s order imposing sanctions on
Abell for failure to comply with the court’s order compelling
his compliance with discovery in his bankruptcy case. On
appeal, Abell asserts due process challenges and argues that the
bankruptcy court abused its discretion by imposing the
sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of
discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Abell v. Wilson, No.
8:14-cv-01037-DKC (D. Md. July 3, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.