Eugene Sherlock Holmes v. State of North Carolina

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2270
EUGENE SHERLOCK HOLMES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; ROY COOPER, as Administrator of the
Estate of Attorney General for the State of North Carolina;
ALL MEDIA T.V. STATIONS IN NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:14-cv-00570-FDW-DSC)
Submitted: March 12, 2015 Decided: March 16, 2015
Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene T. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Sherlock Holmes appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as frivolous
and for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th
Cir. R. 34(b). Because Holmes does not challenge in his
informal brief the basis for the district court’s disposition,
he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --