14-6134•Randall Lee Conrad v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
14-6134Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 de abr. de 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6134
RANDALL LEE CONRAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; DEPT. OF JUSTICE; R. A. PERDUE,
Warden; MR. CREASY, Counselor; MS. WILSON, Secretary; MRS.
THROPE, Officer,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
NUMEROUS FCI GILMER EMPLOYEES, Officers, Secretaries,
Counselors, Case Managers, etc.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh,
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00133-GMG-JES)
Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randall Lee Conrad, Appellant Pro Se. Alan McGonigal, Assistant
United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Randall Lee Conrad appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Conrad v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 3:12-cv-00133-
GMG-JES (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.