John Roosevelt Baccus v. Bristow Marchant; David C. Norton

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6517
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BRISTOW MARCHANT; DAVID C. NORTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (8:13-cv-03439-JFA)
Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 29, 2014
Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Roosevelt Baccus, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
John Roosevelt Baccus appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Baccus v. Marchant, No. 8:13-cv-03439-JFA (D.S.C.
Apr. 1, 2014). We grant Baccus’s motion for judicial notice of
records. We deny all other outstanding motions. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --