Alexander Otis Matthews v. Timothy Joseph Sullivan

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7347
ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TIMOTHY JOSEPH SULLIVAN; LIAM O’GRADY, U.S. District Court
Judge; ROGER W. TITUS, U.S. District Court Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (8:14-cv-00500-FPS)
Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Alexander Matthews appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his complaint and amended complaint filed
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
and denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.* We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Matthews v. Sullivan, No. 8:14-cv-00500-FPS (D. Md. May 23 &
Aug. 13, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* In his motion for reconsideration and on appeal, Matthews
asserts that the court should have considered some of his claims
as common law professional malpractice, negligence, and gross
negligence claims.

-- 2 of 2 --