United States of America v. Bruce Lee Richardson, a/k/a Chino

14-7391Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19 de dez. de 2014

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7391
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRUCE LEE RICHARDSON, a/k/a Chino,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Martin K.
Reidinger, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00010-MR-DLH-1)
Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: December 19, 2014
Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce Lee Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast,
Assistant United States Attorney. Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Bruce Lee Richardson appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Richardson, No. 2:06-cr-00010-MR-DLH-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.