Keith Earl Godwin v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director

14-7534Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21 de jan. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7534
KEITH EARL GODWIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE, Director; ROBERT F. HALEY, II, Commonwealth
Attorney; CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:13-cv-00691-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Earl Godwin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Keith Earl Godwin appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Godwin v. Clarke, No. 2:13-cv-00691-RAJ-TEM
(E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.