Anton Johnson v. Amy Phenix

14-7612Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19 de mar. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7612
ANTON JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AMY PHENIX,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-ct-03312-BO)
Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anton Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Patrick Edgerton, Francis
Lachicotte Zemp, Jr., ROBERTS & STEVENS, PA, Asheville, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Anton Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his civil action for failure to state a claim. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Johnson v. Phenix, No. 5:13-ct-03312-BO
(E.D.N.C. Oct. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.