William Scott Davis, Ii v. James A. Hunt

15-2476Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit1 de ago. de 2016

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2476
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES A. HUNT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:11-cv-00035-D)
Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 1, 2016
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motions to reopen and to amend the judgment
in a closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Hunt,
No. 5:11-cv-00035-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 2, 2015; Nov. 23, 2015). We
deny Davis’ motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.