15-7589•James L. Roudabush, Jr. v. HYLTON, CDUSM, U. S. Marshal Service
15-7589Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de mar. de 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7589
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HYLTON, CDUSM, U. S. Marshal Service; D. LAWHORNE, Sheriff;
STERNS, Chief; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY - ALEXANDRIA (VA);
K. PEDERSEN, AUSA, EDVA; F. MILANO, Captain; J. COREY;
G. HUNTER; LIEUTENANT M. JOSIAH; DIRECTOR, American
Correctional Association; C. M. HILTON, USDJ, EDVA; EDWARD
SEMONIAN, Circuit Court Clerk; R. STERNS, Deputy,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:15-cv-00376-RBS-TEM)
Submitted: February 16, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016
Before WYNN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Lester Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau
of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)
(2012) for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Roudabush v. Hylton, No.
2:15-cv-00376-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. Sept. 2, 2015). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.