Judy Kay Miskell v. Harry L. Chase; William L. Haugh, Jr.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1108
JUDY KAY MISKELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HARRY L. CHASE; WILLIAM L. HAUGH, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00019-CCB)
Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 22, 2016
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Judy Kay Miskell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Judy Kay Miskell appeals the district court’s order
returning correspondence that Miskell attempted to file in her
closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Miskell v. Chase, No.
1:15−cv−00019-CCB (D. Md. Jan. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --