King Grant-Davis v. Supreme Court of South Carolina

16-1143Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22 de abr. de 2016

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1143
KING GRANT-DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA COURT OF
APPEALS; SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (2:15-cv-04019-PMD)
Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 22, 2016
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
King Grant-Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
King Grant-Davis appeals the district court’s order
accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Grant-Davis v. Sup. Ct. of S.C., No. 2:15-cv-04019-PMD
(D.S.C. Jan. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.