Lemoyne Veney v. Tamera Lynn Fine; Mark Walter Crooks; Manisha Garner; Brendan Hurson; Robert Spelke

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6070
LEMOYNE VENEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
V.
TAMERA LYNN FINE; MARK WALTER CROOKS; MANISHA GARNER;
BRENDAN HURSON; ROBERT SPELKE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-03965-RDB)
Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lemoyne Veney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Lemoyne Vesey appeals the district court’s order dismissing
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) his complaint filed pursuant
to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Veney v. Fine, No.
1:15-cv-03965-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 8, 2016). We also deny Veney’s
motions to amend the complaint, to strike the district court’s
order, to disqualify the district court judge, to assign
counsel, and for the production of transcripts and other
documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --