United States of America v. Michael Alonza Rufus

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6181
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (3:02-cr-00550-MBS-1)
Submitted: June 30, 2016 Decided: July 11, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Acting
United States Attorney, William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. See United States v. Rufus, No. 3:02-cr-00550-
MBS-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --