William Brown, Jr.; B & Mhitech Electric v. Tompkins Builders, Inc.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1025
WILLIAM BROWN, JR.; B & M HITECH ELECTRIC,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
TOMPKINS BUILDERS, INC.; S. B. BALLARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY;
T. K. DAVIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; WATSON ELECTRICAL
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC; DAVID BROWN; DAVID COLLINS;
RICHARD ALLARD, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00599-REP)
Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jaime Brett Wisegarver, HIRSCHLER
FLEISCHER, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William Brown, Jr., and B & M Hitech Electric appeal the district court’s order
dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the Plaintiffs’
motion for an audience and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v.
Tompkins Builders, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-00599-REP (E.D. Va., Dec. 6, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --