Sidney Alexander Jones v. OFFICER ADRIAN ASHFORD, In both his official

17-1146Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit1 de jun. de 2017

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1146
SIDNEY ALEXANDER JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER ADRIAN ASHFORD, In both his official and individual capacities;
TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORP., d/b/a F.Y.E.; WESTFIELD, LLC,
d/b/a Wheaton Mall,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
PO-1 ASHFORD, Badge No. 2695; WESTFIELD GROUP,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:14-cv-03639-TDC)
Submitted: May 19, 2017 Decided: June 1, 2017
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Sidney Alexander Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Marc Pemble Hansen, Edward B. Lattner, John
Paul Markovs, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland; Ronald Greer
DeWald, LIPSHULTZ & HONE CHARTERED, Silver Spring, Maryland; Brian Thomas
Gallager, Michael N. Russo, Jr., COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, PA,
Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Sidney Alexander Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Ashford, No.
8:14-cv-03639-TDC (D. Md. Jan. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.